1 |
Tiemo Kieft <blubber@g.o> said: |
2 |
|
3 |
>> Documenting fonts is like setting defaults : a disaster, what you like |
4 |
>> on your monitor looks pretty bad on another persons LCD, etc. It's so |
5 |
>> much a personal thing that setting up defaults will always upset some |
6 |
>> users. And should such a document support legacy font support (xfs, xft1 |
7 |
>> etc. ?). I guess one could set up a document describing what is possible |
8 |
>> in configuring xft2/fontconfig. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> We could ask our users what they want instead of just deciding. If a |
11 |
> large majority hates KDE's default settings (for instance) why might as |
12 |
> well change them. The forums could be a good place to begin with, I |
13 |
> think the user is very important... |
14 |
|
15 |
I prefer proposing things, then see reactions and feedbacks, instead of |
16 |
starting endless discussions, especially in the gentoo community. If you come |
17 |
with precise proposition, it's easy to say yes/no to it, and to make things |
18 |
evolve quickly. |
19 |
|
20 |
So of course users are the goal, but we want to propose things, not discuss 3 |
21 |
months long |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
dams |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
gentoo-desktop-research@g.o mailing list |