1 |
On 11/18/03 03:07:19, munky@××××××.com wrote: |
2 |
> In that case, we should establish what programs we would like to |
3 |
> include |
4 |
> in this. First, perhaps it would be more intelligent to establish |
5 |
> categories: |
6 |
|
7 |
[snip] |
8 |
|
9 |
Nice initiative. Might I suggest you maintain this list and add it to |
10 |
the desktop-research project pages? |
11 |
|
12 |
In general, there exist several 'best of breed' applications for |
13 |
different environments so how about adding what apps are native |
14 |
to which DE? I run gnome 2.4 exclusively (this mail is written using |
15 |
the gnome2 MUA balsa which works wonderfully), some run mixed |
16 |
environments, some run pure KDE and yet others run XFCE and |
17 |
some even run a 'non DE' with fluxbox et al. |
18 |
|
19 |
I think it would make the most sense if we target our efforts on the |
20 |
'de facto' DE standards (drag n' drop, mime-database etc as embodied |
21 |
in KDE, gnome and XFCE). |
22 |
|
23 |
In other words if someone decides that fluxbox is really cool, |
24 |
rxvt+mutt is the only 'non-bloated' MUA solution, drag n' drop |
25 |
is a some fancy new-fangled concept of no real use, mime-type-handling |
26 |
is a shortlived fad, then, well, he/she isn't really in the target |
27 |
audience for the 'gentoo desktop experience'. |
28 |
|
29 |
Anyway, target audience is a central concept and I can't help but |
30 |
wonder where we are in this respect. Comments please! |
31 |
|
32 |
/ermo |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
gentoo-desktop-research@g.o mailing list |