| 1 |
"Duncan" <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Thus the dynamic is quite different. It makes less sense to have a single |
| 4 |
> global qt flag, because the versions are rather more independent of each |
| 5 |
> other, few packages support both at the same time, and the two versions |
| 6 |
> can therefore almost be treated as two entirely independent toolkits in |
| 7 |
> terms of USE flags. Practically, the difference between qt3 and qt4 |
| 8 |
> dependiencies is almost as wide as that between qt3 and gtk, thus |
| 9 |
> justifying the separate USE flags. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I would think that the opposite would be true. As few packages support |
| 12 |
both, I would think that this is a good reason to just have one qt USE |
| 13 |
flag which pulls in support for whichever version of qt each |
| 14 |
individual package supports. The only package I have seen which would |
| 15 |
support the need for having separate USE flags is |
| 16 |
app-text/poppler-bindings which can support either or both qt3 and |
| 17 |
qt4. |
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
gentoo-desktop@g.o mailing list |
Archives