1 |
Lindsay Haisley <fmouse-gentoo@×××.com> posted |
2 |
20070206181629.GA19923@×××.com, excerpted below, on Tue, 06 Feb 2007 |
3 |
12:16:29 -0600: |
4 |
|
5 |
> Thus spake Daniel Gryniewicz on Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 10:19:17AM CST |
6 |
>> In general, reiserfs is considered dead by the linux kernel guys, and by |
7 |
>> it's last remaining maintainer in particular |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Sigh! |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Why do I always seem to pick loosers when it comes to software technology. |
12 |
> All the important partitions on two of my servers and on my desktop |
13 |
> Gentoo box are reiserfs. I suppose in a couple of years kernel support |
14 |
> for reiserfs will start to get flakey and I'll be in a pickle unless I |
15 |
> rebuild the boxes. |
16 |
|
17 |
It'll be more than a couple years, as there's a LOT of installed base out |
18 |
there for it. Remember, SuSE and others defaulted to reiserfs for many |
19 |
years, and people are running servers on it and won't want to change until |
20 |
they die and are replaced, if they can help it. Since it's those guys |
21 |
that pay the money to the distributions that in turn pay many of the |
22 |
kernel devs, it's a safe bet to say reiserfs support will be around for |
23 |
a good while -- almost CERTAINLY for another hardware generation or two. |
24 |
|
25 |
Also, keep in mind that even in the linked post, he was talking about |
26 |
globalfs as the replacement, and he said it wasn't ready and wasn't |
27 |
/going/ to be ready for awhile. |
28 |
|
29 |
IMO, reiserfs will continue to be a solid choice for several more years |
30 |
anyway, during which time filesystems technology will continue to |
31 |
evolve. Thus, at least for those comfortable with reiserfs now, there's |
32 |
no need to get worried for another hardware upgrade or two, by which |
33 |
time the choices will have likely evolved to the point where an upgrade |
34 |
path is reasonably clear, and those switching now just to get off the |
35 |
supposedly dying reiserfs, will be kicking themselves for not waiting, and |
36 |
thus either having to do yet another fs migration, or watching everybody |
37 |
else play with the new best choice while they are stuck with what was the |
38 |
best choice back in early 2007. |
39 |
|
40 |
Think about it. Say three years ago, who would have thought xfree86 would |
41 |
be past history for most Linux users by now? Who would have predicted |
42 |
xorg. Who would have predicted the drastically different kernel 2.6 |
43 |
development model, with Andrew's -mm becoming what amounts to the |
44 |
developer kernel, and no 2.7 in sight? On the other side, who would have |
45 |
predicted Hans Reiser would get into the legal trouble he's seeing now, |
46 |
accused of killing his wife? |
47 |
|
48 |
We see what happened in the last three years. How can we possibly look |
49 |
ahead three years and predict with any certainty what sorts of other |
50 |
drastic Linux world altering events will happen, and what that will do to |
51 |
shape the choices we have at that time in the mean time? While I'd not |
52 |
necessarily recommend reiserfs for newbies to get into, those using it and |
53 |
already comfortable with it have no reason to change right away if they |
54 |
are happy with it, since there's nothing close to matching its |
55 |
particular featureset, and every reason to wait awhile, thus being better |
56 |
positioned to examine the opportunities as they arise, without having to |
57 |
jump filesystems twice in three to four years! |
58 |
|
59 |
If you are switching hardware and have a good reason to change ATM, do so. |
60 |
If you are comfortable where you are, there's every reason to believe |
61 |
that's not going to change significantly thru at least this hardware |
62 |
upgrade cycle. At the next one, examine where things are, and go from |
63 |
there. |
64 |
|
65 |
That's what I'm doing, anyway, because I happen to believe it's the most |
66 |
solid and logical choice available, under the circumstances. |
67 |
|
68 |
-- |
69 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
70 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
71 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
72 |
|
73 |
-- |
74 |
gentoo-desktop@g.o mailing list |