From: | Peter Humphrey <prh@××××××××××.uk> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-desktop@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-desktop] Re: Openssh really needed in desktop profiles? | ||
Date: | Sat, 03 Mar 2007 14:45:00 | ||
Message-Id: | 200703031102.07481.prh@gotadsl.co.uk | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-desktop] Re: Openssh really needed in desktop profiles? by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> |
1 | On Tuesday 27 February 2007 19:37:23 Duncan wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > The thing is, most other clients aren't part of system. (rsync and wget |
4 | > are, for portage to use, but firefox isn't, and dhcpcd or other dhcp |
5 | > client isn't, despite the number of folks using both, for instance.) |
6 | |
7 | It sounds as though you'd like the openssh package to be split into two - a |
8 | client and a server, analogously to, say, ntp. Is that right? |
9 | |
10 | -- |
11 | Rgds |
12 | Peter |
13 | -- |
14 | gentoo-desktop@g.o mailing list |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-desktop] Re: Openssh really needed in desktop profiles? | "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." <bss03@××××××××××.net> |
[gentoo-desktop] Re: Openssh really needed in desktop profiles? | Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> |