1 |
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 6:06 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
2 |
> Theo Chatzimichos posted on Mon, 19 Mar 2012 10:30:07 +0100 as excerpted: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> Again, the meeting is for 2012 (What's wrong with me??) |
5 |
> |
6 |
> LOL! So I'm not the only one that finds himself doing fine the first |
7 |
> couple months (well, after about the third day anyway) while the new year |
8 |
> is still new enough to be thinking about, but then come March and April |
9 |
> when he's no longer thinking about it, finds himself writing the OLD year |
10 |
> again! |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Not to worry /too/ much. In another several weeks you'll finally get |
13 |
> your fingers trained to write 2012, and then you'll be OK... until next |
14 |
> year when it happens all over again! Here, I'm usually about finished |
15 |
> with the adjustment by mid April, tho there's been a few years where the |
16 |
> problem has triggered a time or two in June, even. But I don't recall |
17 |
> having the problem after June, ever. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> =:^\ |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Unfortunately, I had a similar Y2K triggered problem... with a cycle time |
22 |
> in years. For some reason, about 2008 or so, I suddenly found myself |
23 |
> writing 199... again! The only explanation for THAT I can think of is |
24 |
> that it actually TOOK that long for the novelty of writing 200... to wear |
25 |
> off. I didn't have so much problem with 201... but based on that, I |
26 |
> won't, either, until 2016 or 2018. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> =:^\ |
29 |
|
30 |
No, the Qt meeting's date was a mistake because at the same time I was |
31 |
writing some 2011 reports at work, and the KDE meeting's mail was a |
32 |
copy-paste of the Qt one, where I didn't correct all the dates |