| 1 |
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 16:42 -0500, mail wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 16:18 -0500, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 16:01 -0500, mail wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 16:06 +0100, Christoph Nodes wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > > There is already a bug report: |
| 6 |
> > > > |
| 7 |
> > > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=166374 |
| 8 |
> > > |
| 9 |
> > > OK, thats Great, |
| 10 |
> > > I am hoping that someone is working on it. |
| 11 |
> > > |
| 12 |
> > > In the mean time, it is almost tax season. Is there a simple way to |
| 13 |
> > > emerge a working version for now? |
| 14 |
> > > |
| 15 |
> > > Thanks |
| 16 |
> > > rick |
| 17 |
> > > |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > It probably won't be fixed, since it's a glib 1.2 bug, and no one really |
| 20 |
> > cars about glib 1.2. The easiest solution is to emerge the ~arch |
| 21 |
> > g-wrap, which uses glib 2.x and works fine. It'd be nice if the scheme |
| 22 |
> > guys marked that stable, but there's nothing I can do about it. |
| 23 |
> > |
| 24 |
> > Daniel |
| 25 |
> > |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> I'n not too familiar with emerging things like that. How do I emerge a |
| 28 |
> ~arch g-wrap? do I put something special in /etc/portage/package.use ? |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
echo "=dev-libs/g-wrap-1.9.6-r1" >> /etc/portage/package.keywords |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Daniel |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
gentoo-desktop@g.o mailing list |
Archives