1 |
Johannes Huber posted on Sat, 06 Jul 2013 19:02:55 +0200 as excerpted: |
2 |
|
3 |
> For the record you offer nothing for users who want to use kdepim and |
4 |
> thats where the big story ends for us. |
5 |
|
6 |
Well, obviously if they want to use kdepim, they need to have the |
7 |
dependencies (now) needed for it... which basically means semantic- |
8 |
desktop. That's a given. But for those who steer well clear of kdepim |
9 |
in part because of its heavy deps... it'd be nice to still have the |
10 |
choice to /avoid/ those deps... without having to hack and patch ebuilds |
11 |
to do it. |
12 |
|
13 |
Just the usual options gentooers are used to having, both in general and |
14 |
specifically with kde4, is all. |
15 |
|
16 |
But I didn't go into this expecting to change gentoo/kde policy. I |
17 |
thought I'd ask, just in case, but I didn't expect it to change. Given |
18 |
that the only user response so far is (effectively) that I'm making a |
19 |
mountain out of a molehill... Tho I'm not sure how many people in the |
20 |
potential audience actually read this list. If I were to start a thread |
21 |
on the forums and if I had added a comment to the blog-post announcing |
22 |
the gentoo/kde policy change asking if there's interest there, since |
23 |
there /were/ a couple comments expressing disappointment... But I'll |
24 |
probably just continue doing the patches myself, until 5/frameworks gets |
25 |
in good enough shape to migrate to it (assuming that's not too distant), |
26 |
at which point, hopefully, upstream will be modular enough that there |
27 |
won't be an issue any longer. Else, if that turns out to be too far out |
28 |
and I can't maintain the patches, I'll simply find another desktop. As I |
29 |
said, unlike with the early kde4 thing, that's actually a practical |
30 |
option, now. |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
34 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
35 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |