1 |
Tomáš Chvátal wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> - qt4-tng eclass |
4 |
> Here i dunno what ever you plan guys, so enlighten me :P |
5 |
|
6 |
We have had qt4-edge.eclass in qting-edge overlay for quite some time |
7 |
now. I think that most of the new functionality is ready to go to |
8 |
portage. As we now define phases we did not before, it would break |
9 |
qt.eclass. So we decided to go for a new eclass. We said we would still |
10 |
brainstorm/bikeshed over the name for this eclass, but i haven't heard |
11 |
anything better than qt4-tng so far. New ideas are welcome. |
12 |
|
13 |
As far as I understand the langs handling still needs work, or are we |
14 |
ready to commit that as well? |
15 |
|
16 |
Is there anything else needed, or any other comments, before we propose |
17 |
the new eclass to -dev ML? |
18 |
|
19 |
Cheers, |
20 |
|
21 |
Ben |