1 |
On 6/14/07, George Shapovalov <george@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> Wednesday, 13. June 2007, Alexandre Bique Ви напиÑали: |
3 |
> > What do you think of adding a dev-d category to portage ? |
4 |
> > If you don't know the D programing language, you should take |
5 |
> > a look at http://www.digitalmars.com/d/ it's very exciting ;-) |
6 |
> Well, I do know about D, but what I would like to know about is how many |
7 |
> D-related packages are we talking about here? Is there some list somwhere, |
8 |
> best of all in a bug? That really is the basis for the decision. Last time |
9 |
> when I looked for D reated submissions (triggered by that gdc bug) I only |
10 |
> could see two and even then those were for the compilers themselves (gdc and |
11 |
> dmd) and these will go under dev-lang. Another category only makes sense if |
12 |
> there are enough D libs or other D-specific packages ready for inclusion or |
13 |
> already scattered around the tree. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Actually, on second read I feel a bit confused. Are you talking about |
16 |
> including the D compiler itself by chance? In that case you are too late - it |
17 |
> is already in ;). Check the use flags of later gcc versions and try to look |
18 |
> for dmd as well. That last one might not be in yet (not sure completely, D |
19 |
> was finally taken over by somebody, so I stopped paying much attention) but n |
20 |
> any case you might find the ebuild in bugzilla, just search for dmd. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> George |
23 |
We can add some libs to portage, like Derelict, tango, arclib, yage3d |
24 |
build tools like bud, dsss and apps like leds, etc... you can go to |
25 |
http://www.dsource.org/projects/ |
26 |
there are a lot of interesting projects. It's very interesting because |
27 |
it's the time |
28 |
to define the clean way to install a package and allow people to use D |
29 |
in a simple way like it is with C/C++. |
30 |
|
31 |
> PS |
32 |
> We also have this mailing list?? Amaizing, I did not realize that :). Even |
33 |
> though I don't remember signing up for it, but that may be because I am on |
34 |
> lang-misc herd. In any case, I suspect there are not that many peple on this |
35 |
> list, so, in general, you might get better luck on gentoo-dev. It gets too |
36 |
> little attention lately (what I mean is, it severely lacks development |
37 |
> contents, may be this is the reason there are so many falmes on it :)). |
38 |
|
39 |
|
40 |
-- |
41 |
Alexandre Bique (bique.alexandre@×××××.com) |
42 |
éí¢‡^¾V§‚§¶Š(® šŠX§‚X¬ |