Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev-lang

From: Alexandre Bique <bique.alexandre@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev-lang@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev-lang] The D language
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 11:42:40
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev-lang] The D language by George Shapovalov
On 6/14/07, George Shapovalov <george@g.o> wrote:
> Wednesday, 13. June 2007, Alexandre Bique Ви написали: > > What do you think of adding a dev-d category to portage ? > > If you don't know the D programing language, you should take > > a look at it's very exciting ;-) > Well, I do know about D, but what I would like to know about is how many > D-related packages are we talking about here? Is there some list somwhere, > best of all in a bug? That really is the basis for the decision. Last time > when I looked for D reated submissions (triggered by that gdc bug) I only > could see two and even then those were for the compilers themselves (gdc and > dmd) and these will go under dev-lang. Another category only makes sense if > there are enough D libs or other D-specific packages ready for inclusion or > already scattered around the tree. > > Actually, on second read I feel a bit confused. Are you talking about > including the D compiler itself by chance? In that case you are too late - it > is already in ;). Check the use flags of later gcc versions and try to look > for dmd as well. That last one might not be in yet (not sure completely, D > was finally taken over by somebody, so I stopped paying much attention) but n > any case you might find the ebuild in bugzilla, just search for dmd. > > George
We can add some libs to portage, like Derelict, tango, arclib, yage3d build tools like bud, dsss and apps like leds, etc... you can go to there are a lot of interesting projects. It's very interesting because it's the time to define the clean way to install a package and allow people to use D in a simple way like it is with C/C++.
> PS > We also have this mailing list?? Amaizing, I did not realize that :). Even > though I don't remember signing up for it, but that may be because I am on > lang-misc herd. In any case, I suspect there are not that many peple on this > list, so, in general, you might get better luck on gentoo-dev. It gets too > little attention lately (what I mean is, it severely lacks development > contents, may be this is the reason there are so many falmes on it :)).
-- Alexandre Bique (bique.alexandre@×××××.com) éí¢‡^¾V§‚§¶Š(® šŠX§‚X¬


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev-lang] The D language Luis Francisco Araujo <araujo@g.o>