From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 499951382C5 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 18:32:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AC41CE0A5C; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 18:32:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73CB1E09E9 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 18:32:17 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH] acct-user.eclass: don't modify existing user by default To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20210104013558.20072-1-whissi@gentoo.org> <89a1c171-de56-4f9e-af2a-9140d2be3552@gentoo.org> From: Thomas Deutschmann Organization: Gentoo Linux Message-ID: <144546f7-5165-4ac4-0da5-7ecfa9b7b8b2@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 19:32:12 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mJUDhzjeEKf3DTDOe2bg8oK7d93rQKTzX" X-Archives-Salt: f9727afc-82a1-4b13-8a4b-3421a4df880f X-Archives-Hash: 42a91c0745fe2b5bf87f9e25c165dc1a This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --mJUDhzjeEKf3DTDOe2bg8oK7d93rQKTzX Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="y9nCciAb5JaMfPrNlAgqnEDRtxGAtCOh1"; protected-headers="v1" From: Thomas Deutschmann To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <144546f7-5165-4ac4-0da5-7ecfa9b7b8b2@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH] acct-user.eclass: don't modify existing user by default References: <20210104013558.20072-1-whissi@gentoo.org> <89a1c171-de56-4f9e-af2a-9140d2be3552@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: --y9nCciAb5JaMfPrNlAgqnEDRtxGAtCOh1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2021-01-04 19:27, Michael Orlitzky wrote: >> People like me could just ignore changed users if changes won't go liv= e >> until you run said users-update command or make use of INSTALL_MASK. >> >=20 > Changes wouldn't go live until you ran etc-update, and *then* users-upd= ate. This would address my concerns. But I still wonder if building such a system is worth it... I mean, it=20 would be nice to have. Maybe we could build upon such a system to do=20 same for (changed) file permissions... --=20 Regards, Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 --y9nCciAb5JaMfPrNlAgqnEDRtxGAtCOh1-- --mJUDhzjeEKf3DTDOe2bg8oK7d93rQKTzX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsB5BAABCAAjFiEEExKRzo+LDXJgXHuURObr3Jv2BVkFAl/zXywFAwAAAAAACgkQRObr3Jv2BVlD Swf/QVHom719eGi6gI8Ndw2Yh3nkhjUhFPdQ64FEDi520ykKZK0wFuZaY6he7lML49DGCY+MIRV4 Bk3rMxL4agSPukxiqTLrEXJIduxzekbBDhTkdysTa4O4TLIsn+uGwGht85bmRMF5MGei1JadCYJn BUTUpblycY4zfQO9KrWSi5TmG7mjwwHeoWScCI7GA3x8Px9rbuGo/365XOLKCDDxjcazY0yQGYbr eu7N6LD4Qjzf8uQU0LpsXi2AyAeVIOYiCxnmRhh5xGoLz1q0fl0Le+v7ebh0+3nihsRxZRpwSOo1 HPJq5GwHAyw6ikfzu9OYYmX/tp0bkskp85NVHrWUMA== =ytBb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mJUDhzjeEKf3DTDOe2bg8oK7d93rQKTzX--