From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8BEF158042 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2024 15:21:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5616BE0883; Mon, 28 Oct 2024 15:21:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15368E0875 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2024 15:21:20 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <54de2ebf62c2e2510e59a7b914dc10907a9f8657.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: New PostgreSQL categories From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 16:21:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: <7eb6a37e-bd6a-434b-b97a-21eacdbed981@gentoo.org> References: <7eb6a37e-bd6a-434b-b97a-21eacdbed981@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-D45VMMt/lgKdpZuPnjPt" User-Agent: Evolution 3.52.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 6c580476-e2fd-4047-ab22-51cd1c9f772b X-Archives-Hash: 2b46bde8551160ad18e5bef2f23c4909 --=-D45VMMt/lgKdpZuPnjPt Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2024-10-28 at 14:49 +0100, Patrick Lauer wrote: > I've just returned from the pgconf.eu conference, and this has motivated= =20 > me to try to improve the packaging situation for all things PostgreSQL= =20 > in Gentoo. >=20 > Right now everything just goes into dev-db/ category. That's not=20 > inherently wrong, but it feels a bit overloaded to me. So I'd like to=20 > add two new categories. I'm relatively indifferent about the naming,=20 > good suggestions welcome, but locally I ended up naming them "pg-tools"= =20 > and "pg-extensions". As the name suggests, one category is tools around= =20 > PostgreSQL, and the other is extensions. (Or maybe it makes sense to put= =20 > all of it into a dev-postgres category?) That's inconsistently long with how we name categories. "-plugins" would probably be more consistent too. > - extensions, new packages: > [=E2=80=A6] Are you actually going to maintain all these new packages, or just dump and effectively abandon them, as usual? --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-D45VMMt/lgKdpZuPnjPt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFGBAABCgAwFiEEx2qEUJQJjSjMiybFY5ra4jKeJA4FAmcfq+oSHG1nb3JueUBn ZW50b28ub3JnAAoJEGOa2uIyniQOAgIH/0WZKmH67WLinC9L2vg4jmnokLgabUDf QJnZbsOeHJFkXtscHYDGuqIn+0TwOobGore9bqjEwtSVQjgC21CYbhDe3jb/N2B6 V9Xfmo+UPDLB6cYhi8dBBVGsINKFzyeGid6UBZE3d31AP5NcwMiX+CAAT2ZBPPfP sp9CCoOAUtppIG8QC83FJynWRmBDipiZ239oz+p8EGoGXRijygHo7reGKubp8IAS Ba9/XGeTHHnfsGRUl5I/aeATZqF64RfR9vV3VbVeqSPNf0LEvElIGXM2kl02Ondb QavXPseeMBe4d+q9Lb4AWWsHJjlzMMsdep6OOhAN8aUjTl3+DeRltiU= =qEzk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-D45VMMt/lgKdpZuPnjPt--