From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C895158042 for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2024 09:03:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6CFAFE0819; Sun, 20 Oct 2024 09:03:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9048E0805 for ; Sun, 20 Oct 2024 09:03:30 +0000 (UTC) From: Sam James To: =?utf-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Slotting PyPy In-Reply-To: (=?utf-8?Q?=22Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny=22's?= message of "Sat, 19 Oct 2024 14:04:04 +0200") Organization: Gentoo References: <87msj0s7b5.fsf@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2024 10:03:26 +0100 Message-ID: <87h697rvs1.fsf@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: e2ada0cb-adb8-4af8-a110-3c0a5592d1cd X-Archives-Hash: 708e2c5e7a66d798a59bc3e2c60554ae Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny writes: > On Sat, 2024-10-19 at 11:42 +0100, Sam James wrote: >> I think we should do it, but I have one question: I thought (I might be >> misremembering though) that one reason for the existing scheme was to >> allow easy testing of pypy versions for the same Python version outside >> of packages (e.g. test two pypy3.10 versions). > > Not sure what you mean by that. You can't have two pypy3.10 versions > installed simultaneously. Unless you mean switching between versions > without having to rebuild the whole interpreter -- that part will remain > as-is, since pypy*-exe* will remain separate, though I'm not sure yet if > I'll merge them into slots or leave completely separate. Yeah, that's what I was getting at - but I don't think it's a big dela anyw= ay.