From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61A241382C5 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 16:04:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF1C2E0828; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 16:04:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 724E2E081A for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 16:04:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-il1-f180.google.com with SMTP id t3so6626041ilh.9 for ; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 08:04:04 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53118sct7qIfRdbx+yCee41Myi6EM4u0iO1UWCP4jHn8o5tcmlBR sSVfG76NNMR0vkV+4eBz6f0rNIAO4QgbrWRPwMw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyFFEh6TeT4Qd9gdKxdHdXj81A/0xmSdmunKeqneS/YEoxMZ19vm8Q2nL3BUiEtAgek780bsbi3YifWVtSIyeY= X-Received: by 2002:a92:845c:: with SMTP id l89mr4518173ild.114.1610121842889; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 08:04:02 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210104013558.20072-1-whissi@gentoo.org> <091a2d35-1437-48d5-031f-6499db0a29c6@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <091a2d35-1437-48d5-031f-6499db0a29c6@gentoo.org> From: Mike Gilbert Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 11:03:51 -0500 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] acct-user.eclass: don't modify existing user by default To: Gentoo Dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Archives-Salt: 5c7a2601-9c7c-4f7c-a412-ef6f823a2a76 X-Archives-Hash: af343d14c9e8621acd7a2c6b39018130 On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 10:48 AM Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > > Hi, > > since nobody posted any technical objections, I am going to push the > proposed patch on Saturday to address the current issue and allow any > professional Gentoo user relying on usermod/configuration management > tool to move on. I strongly object to you pushing this patch as-is. There have been plenty of non-technical objections, including from the eclass maintainer.