From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AC5E1382C5 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 18:11:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6C5C5E0874; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 18:11:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3676EE084E for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 18:11:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 19:11:10 +0100 From: Fabian Groffen To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] acct-user.eclass: don't modify existing user by default Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20210104013558.20072-1-whissi@gentoo.org> <809f727af51f7dcd9aec97a800c0ecd89f60eaa6.camel@gentoo.org> <85a7ff62c353e13e2c2c8c93b7c90282d6d1f045.camel@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SweD1mYHIESiB5F2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <85a7ff62c353e13e2c2c8c93b7c90282d6d1f045.camel@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/2.0.4 (Darwin 20.2.0, VIM - Vi IMproved 8.2) Organization: Gentoo Foundation, Inc. X-Archives-Salt: ef60b450-4f9b-4969-89fe-32e5f4055a85 X-Archives-Hash: 02dbbffd6929ae8f596c258172bd8f1c --SweD1mYHIESiB5F2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 04-01-2021 17:14:47 +0100, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > Yes, I don't mind an option, as long as it spews a big fat ewarn that > the user loses the right to support. However, that's still not > the right solution to the immediate problem, and I'm currently working > on a better patch, so I'd prefer if you waited with that to avoid merge > conflicts. Could you please share your intended approach? Thanks, Fabian --=20 Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level --SweD1mYHIESiB5F2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEELUvHd/Gtp7LaU1vuzpXahU5EQpMFAl/4oDwACgkQzpXahU5E QpOvjwgAkK9IdgtKgbtX2tRSf3oPwfLS7n2bCHk9xndv+CMxjAkpBUmY8PpxFCw3 S/lrVTm1rbqc8Tyt46DTn9+8hn+kBWnSzOtX+5sHJUuP60Xe4TL44YNztKwL9Vvy +o9MJFR2dUSrGRonzhDFXI8833jY0U9I54uIkD4AQf9E7HfJ5EjSDly+vOTNQDWc plcTaYbXzzp7vBA5c5eE/zKmVvi18U64nTgJIldfcMxp0iRQUezlH84qRL3hgzul 4Shrwo8rZ0E1AS+xVP9Ij//Roigyz5YVotIDPrsLpjqSYnH1hjko9uSULIfBmAf5 v3fekU1iMhNXvcCohg3PwNv7vfwVRA== =HkLF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SweD1mYHIESiB5F2--