From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4506015808A for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2025 14:33:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gentoo.org (bobolink.gentoo.org [140.211.166.189]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: relay-lists.gentoo.org@gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 27E4C341FAE for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2025 14:33:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bobolink.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bobolink.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBDBA110567; Sun, 27 Jul 2025 14:32:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by bobolink.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34D7A1102A2 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2025 14:32:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eversor (unknown [166.62.140.157]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ionen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C77A6340FFE for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2025 14:32:12 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2025 10:32:10 -0400 From: Ionen Wolkens To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <6ee617916095e4a821437344e0b297bd3b1d9097.camel@gentoo.org> <68390a6f-1db6-4a4c-842f-f4d7e13b8145@disroot.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YsV6KmDSERj1g2wE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <68390a6f-1db6-4a4c-842f-f4d7e13b8145@disroot.org> X-Archives-Salt: db924259-53b7-4888-93bd-6c8e65f99af0 X-Archives-Hash: b672304dcdbe70125af527472ad8ca41 --YsV6KmDSERj1g2wE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 27, 2025 at 01:24:28PM +0200, Michal Rostecki wrote: > On 7/26/25 17:48, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > dev-libs/jemalloc >=20 > I can volunteer for this one. In general, I'm interested in keeping the= =20 > non-libc allocator libs (jemalloc, mimalloc) up-to-date. Unlikely that jemalloc will need updates unless it gets a fork, it's essentially dead last I know of[1] and the official repo is archived. Once it breaks, last-riting may be a better option than trying to maintain it downstream. [1] https://jasone.github.io/2025/06/12/jemalloc-postmortem/ --=20 ionen --YsV6KmDSERj1g2wE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCAAdFiEEx3SLh1HBoPy/yLVYskQGsLCsQzQFAmiGOGoACgkQskQGsLCs QzTxOgf+PRWaTRQugy2Ux3jxPjEfxT1DNb62xx+Z13U3SRDgL8TYYH+YN6VTJOK4 w8XCVvQljr59oUEvGgISiOCWpzS9+Gqy8zqN9f9ai0eXEltuBzW5q2feotqM+L08 /eXB53YPPoC1/fA7q+d5HWTkG/hTOvHfz8GN4xt9t2hX+WJGp8WpTOh4wTg/7qZ9 kthfN/e6pktOwkNCgvHdlAq1Vhns4I1RnRRAMBJu3P8QFfuFphu/bSvqdVprdPQP EQTSreHPpv+H1FdFEsihXn91yHyqnEqZY4LFLGYZ4AZ2TuEE7KdQoQLz84QdhTj2 vVRAWINqSr4lyiPOhJTgBkpG/sJgIA== =6Z0Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YsV6KmDSERj1g2wE--