From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DFFE1382C5 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 16:56:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F96FE09FE; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 16:56:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38202E09F8 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 16:56:05 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] acct-user.eclass: don't modify existing user by default From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 17:56:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: <3ed68aa1-1cb3-f2bd-0bb0-7db6c41c99b3@gentoo.org> References: <20210104013558.20072-1-whissi@gentoo.org> <60fac781-e080-999c-e83e-c657d5b89d18@gentoo.org> <4ca9ea6d4b2c2f0f7c29319d2c0015e2fec2b773.camel@gentoo.org> <6876f32c-5ea8-5c99-41c1-7c8963f5a976@gentoo.org> <5f23b96b-0c35-f564-e5a0-e6eb5abb387b@gentoo.org> <14fba9dd-ac0f-9510-6970-eed430c26687@gentoo.org> <3ed68aa1-1cb3-f2bd-0bb0-7db6c41c99b3@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 50b8cf03-a136-46ad-8dc0-da3ccd3086c6 X-Archives-Hash: 997fd50b549d06e8bde84eee6eacebcc On Mon, 2021-01-04 at 17:50 +0100, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > On 2021-01-04 17:38, Michał Górny wrote: > > You've actually added 'portage' to group 'thomas'. > > Yes, I know that. > > Well, I understand why this might be confusing for you. Like I was using > portage as example for the described example when you give another > service access to a socket like shown in my memcached/redis example. > > This is confusing to me (as is probably to everybody else) because your text is saying the exact opposite. | Add your user to portage's group [...] You're doing the exact opposite. Maybe it's time to admit that you've made a mistake, and you've made the same mistake the second time in a row, and although it was proven wrong before you still keep trying to support your arguments with this mistake. -- Best regards, Michał Górny