On 2021-01-08 19:14, Michał Górny wrote:
> The one floppym suggested, i.e. the same as sent patch but with
> the default staying on the current behavior.

Do I understand correctly? You are willing to accept my patch but with

 > ACCT_USER_ALLOW_EXISTING_USER_TO_BE_MODIFIED

defaulting to a non-zero value to keep current behavior?

This would be an acceptable compromise for me like it would allow users 
like me at least to opt-out. I would still try to convince Gentoo to 
change the default later because I believe this is a bad default but of 
course I would accept any voting results on this implementation detail.


-- 
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5