public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nowa Ammerlaan <andrewammerlaan@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Splitting dev-lang/python into per-slot packages, starting with 3.14
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 19:37:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ee477cc2-3403-4768-8df0-e4cd0af6ab58@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d3fb6b685e511bce4183b674dd171c9e710765d8.camel@gentoo.org>

On 12/10/2024 10:12, Michał Górny wrote:
> This approach has been causing a major annoyance for users -- due to
> Portage "greedy" upgrade behavior, any time a new Python version was
> keyworded, Portage insisted on installing it, even though user's
> selected targets did not request the specific version.  The potentially
> worst consequence of that would be random user scripts stopping to work,
> as they suddenly start using new Python, while all their dependencies
> are still installed per PYTHON_TARGETS.

I don't understand the problem. Say we have some custom user script with 
#!/usr/bin/python, then this still goes through the python-exec 
mechanism. That config file is protected, so some new python version 
cannot suddenly replace the /usr/bin/python without explicit action from 
the system administrator. So in what scenario exactly does the current 
behavior cause breakage?




  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-10-12 17:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-12  8:12 [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Splitting dev-lang/python into per-slot packages, starting with 3.14 Michał Górny
2024-10-12  8:50 ` [gentoo-dev] " Luca Barbato
2024-10-12  9:13   ` Michał Górny
2024-10-12 12:30     ` Anna (cybertailor) Vyalkova
2024-10-12 13:07       ` Michał Górny
2024-10-12 13:00     ` Luca Barbato
2024-10-12 13:03       ` Michał Górny
2024-10-12 17:36         ` Luca Barbato
2024-10-12 13:12     ` Sam James
2024-10-12  9:49 ` [gentoo-dev] " Eray Aslan
2024-10-12  9:51   ` Michał Górny
2024-10-12  9:59 ` Ulrich Mueller
2024-10-12 10:03   ` Ulrich Mueller
2024-10-12 10:06     ` Michał Górny
2024-10-12 10:05   ` Michał Górny
2024-10-12 10:13     ` Ulrich Mueller
2024-10-12 10:22       ` Michał Górny
2024-10-12 11:23         ` Mitchell Dorrell
2024-10-12 11:49           ` Michał Górny
2024-10-12 15:01     ` Mitchell Dorrell
2024-10-12 15:10       ` Sam James
2024-10-12 17:21     ` Anna (navi) Figueiredo Gomes
2024-10-12 13:52 ` orbea
2024-10-12 14:32   ` Andreas Sturmlechner
2024-10-12 17:37 ` Nowa Ammerlaan [this message]
2024-10-12 18:03 ` Michał Górny
2024-10-12 22:57   ` Mitchell Dorrell
2024-10-14  0:43 ` Sam James
2024-10-14  3:49   ` Michał Górny
2024-10-14  4:09     ` Sam James

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ee477cc2-3403-4768-8df0-e4cd0af6ab58@gentoo.org \
    --to=andrewammerlaan@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox