From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1DB015813A for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2025 19:55:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EC983E08B0; Sat, 18 Jan 2025 19:55:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68F37E07ED for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2025 19:55:18 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 20:55:13 +0100 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] A new bugzilla keyword for bug investigation To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <2645278.Lt9SDvczpP@fcf> Content-Language: de-DE From: Jonas Stein In-Reply-To: <2645278.Lt9SDvczpP@fcf> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 746c3507-afab-4c0b-9285-ccf438233810 X-Archives-Hash: 2302700ded42b8b592462073e693f542 > For that reason I would like to propose a new bugzilla KEYWORD, like: > > - NEEDS-TRIAGE > or > - NEEDS-INVESTIGATION > > or whatever you think is better. > > With that KEYWORD we can set-up a saved search and 'experienced' devs can help to > diagnose the issue. > > This KEYWORD is supposed to be set manually and not supposed to be set automatically > when there is a missing "error: " string. And obviously it can be used by everyone that > needs help. > > Before send this to the mailing list, I talked about that with sam (since he is one of those > who does this activity) and agreed. > > What do you think? In general I think it is a good idea. The difficulty is to find a good tag that is not misunderstood. It should not be mixed with "there are error messages and a user forgot to attach the log" I am also undecided how useful this would be if a bot creates now tons of "NEED_INVESTIGATION" bugs if we have no bots fixing these. :-) A NEED_INVESTIGATION bug will take 100 times of the ressources compared to a usual bug. -- Best, Jonas