| 1 |
On 05/22/2013 08:53 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 21/05/13 07:43 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote: |
| 3 |
> > [ Snip reasons for why opt-out is bad ] |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> So why don't we add something to package metadata, to indicate that a |
| 6 |
> package is OK to be considered for auto-stabilization?? It lets |
| 7 |
> everyone opt-in, and we still have the opportunity to opt-out if we |
| 8 |
> want to at stable-bug-request time (or better, the dev can file their |
| 9 |
> own bug to indicate stabilization will not occur or will occur later |
| 10 |
> once XYZ are met or w/e).. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> We include it in the default metadata.xml template going forward, and |
| 13 |
> request all dev's add it to their packages if they want to contribute. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Thoughts? |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> (Note: I also recall there being some sort of blacklist mentioned, |
| 18 |
> where is the info for that stored? IE, how could I put a package in |
| 19 |
> that blacklist?) |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I was thinking something similar yesterday, except I'd rather it be seen |
| 24 |
as opt-out rather than opt-in. |
Archives