1 |
Ed W wrote: |
2 |
> Hi |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> baselayout-2 was renamed to openrc when Roy left Gentoo as an |
5 |
>> official dev. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Answering my own question (for the record). I found some explanation |
8 |
> here: |
9 |
> http://lycos.dropcode.net/gregarius/author.php?author=Roy_Marples__uberlord_ |
10 |
> |
11 |
> |
12 |
>>> Does Roy hang out here? Roy: Is this intended to be a baselayout |
13 |
>>> replacement? How likely is this to be on-track to become a "gentoo |
14 |
>>> official" baselayout? Do you (try to) support busybox and vserver |
15 |
>>> environments? |
16 |
>> Don't know. Yes. Very. Yes & Yes. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Excellent - this is exciting to hear |
19 |
> |
20 |
> On the other hand since there still isn't a masked ebuild in portage |
21 |
> (and I seem some notes on my on Roy's site) then I have to assume that |
22 |
> in fact we are still a good way away from calling it a replacement and |
23 |
> starting to push it out to users? |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Would it not make sense to start to snapshot some builds and push |
26 |
> openrc out for testing? (Seems like a gentoo job rather than an |
27 |
> upstream is the reason I ask here?) |
28 |
> |
29 |
> Cheers |
30 |
> |
31 |
> Ed W |
32 |
sudo emerge layman |
33 |
sudo layman -L |
34 |
sudo layman -a openrc |
35 |
sudo emerge openrc |
36 |
sudo etc-update |
37 |
-- |
38 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |