| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
At Mon, 4 Aug 2003 01:27:41 +0900, |
| 4 |
Georgi Georgiev wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> An alternative would be to make the package depend on a later portage. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Yeah, I like the idea. But the problem is portage 2.0.48 branch |
| 9 |
(neither stable 2.0.48-r5 nor unstable 2.0.48-r7) doesn't have epatch |
| 10 |
integrated into ebuild.sh, so it needs to be backported. Maybe I |
| 11 |
should file a bug report to dev-portage@g.o ;-) |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
regards, |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Mamoru KOMACHI <usata@g.o> |
| 18 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~usata/ |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives