| 1 |
But categories shouldnt categorize packages for what they do? I mean, |
| 2 |
if i need something to do video editing, i go search in media-video. I |
| 3 |
dont think app-cvs could let people think about cvs ebuilds, i would |
| 4 |
think more about cvs related applications. In my opinion categories |
| 5 |
shouldnt be used for such things, maybe add an herd "cvs" if there isnt |
| 6 |
already is enough. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Lunedì, 14 lug 2003, alle 11:25 Europe/Rome, Tal Peer ha scritto: |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> Hi, |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> While discussing the state of the php-cvs package on #gentoo_dev, |
| 13 |
> lu_zero |
| 14 |
> suggested that we open a new category 'app-cvs' and move all -cvs |
| 15 |
> packages |
| 16 |
> there. That way we don't litter all the categories with -cvs ebuilds |
| 17 |
> that |
| 18 |
> most of users don't need/want. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Comments? |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Tal |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> -- |
| 26 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
Michele Balistreri |
| 30 |
Gentoo Developer, KDE Team |
| 31 |
Rome, Italy |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives