| 1 |
On Sat, 2019-09-21 at 17:45 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 09:57:25PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Sat, 2019-09-21 at 14:26 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 09:17:53PM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > > > > > > > On Sat, 21 Sep 2019, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > > > TL;DR: I'd like to replace 'GPL-2' with 'GPL-2-only' etc., having |
| 7 |
> > > > > the former trigger QA warning asking the dev to double-check if it's |
| 8 |
> > > > > 'GPL-2-only' or 'GPL-2+'. |
| 9 |
> > > > |
| 10 |
> > > > This has been discussed before. There is no such license as GPL-2-only. |
| 11 |
> > > |
| 12 |
> > > I am with ulm on this one. |
| 13 |
> > > We have GPL-2 and GPL-2+ in the tree. The way I read this, |
| 14 |
> > > LICENSE="GPL-2" means GPL 2 only and LICENSE="GPL-2+" means GPL-2+. |
| 15 |
> > > |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > Have you read my original mail? |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Yes, and I just did again, and my position is still the same. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I know what we have now and what it means. The mail includes long |
| 23 |
explanation why this doesn't work. Repeating what we have now does not |
| 24 |
bring any argument to the discussion, except for anger/demotivation |
| 25 |
because it feels like you've completely ignored most of the mail |
| 26 |
and just reject it on the basis of 'it's not what we have now'. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Best regards, |
| 30 |
Michał Górny |
Archives