| 1 |
Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 07:20:07PM +0200, Mikael Hallendal wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Dan Armak <danarmak@g.o> writes: |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > Gnome stuff put there in /opt/gnome/etc which is a symlink to |
| 7 |
> >/etc/opt/gnome, wouldn't it be good to have /etc/opt/kde and have |
| 8 |
> >/opt/kde/share/config point there? |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > What I wonder is what will portage do when it installs into |
| 11 |
> >/opt/gnome/etc and that is a symlink (to a protected directory). Will |
| 12 |
> >it see that the files should be protected or does it think that it's |
| 13 |
> >an unprotected directory? We wan't it to behave in the first way. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Hallski; I'm sure portage has the bug you just described. Could you |
| 16 |
> add it to the wiki and assign it to the System team? Fixing it will |
| 17 |
> be tricky. The best fix may be to have some standards about how/where |
| 18 |
> to create config directories and what is/isn't allowed to be a |
| 19 |
> symlink. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
That might be the best way of doing it yes. We must however fix |
| 22 |
portage to handle this in some way. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Regards, |
| 25 |
Mikael Hallendal |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Mikael Hallendal micke@×××××××××××.se |
| 29 |
CodeFactory AB http://www.codefactory.se/ |
| 30 |
Office: +46 (0)8 587 583 05 Cell: +46 (0)709 718 918 |
Archives