| 1 |
On 02/06/15 14:41, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> Dnia 2015-02-05, o godz. 19:11:11 |
| 3 |
> "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o> napisał(a): |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> I proxy a set of bitcoin ebuilds for Luke-jr. Currently several ebuilds |
| 6 |
>> make use of the same codebase, so its probably a good idea to migrate |
| 7 |
>> that code to an eclass. Can we have the following eclass reviewed |
| 8 |
>> before committing it to the tree: |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> https://gitorious.org/bitcoin/gentoo/source/674d32a2d029aed3bc967a1949f75586828ebe14:eclass/bitcoincore.eclass |
| 11 |
> Looks to me like another toolchain.eclass. I'm against it. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Without any reasons given, this adds nothing to the discussion. At the |
| 15 |
same level of ambiguity, it also looks like another multibuild.eclass. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Such arguments cannot be taken seriously. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. |
| 21 |
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] |
| 22 |
E-Mail : blueness@g.o |
| 23 |
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA |
| 24 |
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA |
Archives