1 |
Thilo Bangert <bangert@g.o> posted |
2 |
200905311126.00274.bangert@g.o, excerpted below, on Sun, 31 May |
3 |
2009 11:25:56 +0200: |
4 |
|
5 |
> the thing is though, nothing constructive is being said. people are |
6 |
> going in circles. ciaran and co are pushing glep55 for reasons which |
7 |
> they have stated gazillion of times and nothing new is coming about. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> other people dislike glep55 for various reasons, but they clearly fail |
10 |
> at proposing a (better) alternative (a competing GLEP). |
11 |
|
12 |
> please, please DO write a competing GLEP if you dislike GLEP55. it's |
13 |
> late, but you might just make it... |
14 |
|
15 |
And this is why GLEP55 is likely ultimately going to be approved, despite |
16 |
all the arguing. At the end of the day, we'll need /some/ solution to |
17 |
the general problem, and the proponents of GLEP55 have troubled |
18 |
themselves to write a GLEP outlining their solution in some depth as well |
19 |
as argue for it over a period of /years/, while the opponents have... |
20 |
troubled themselves enough to argue it for years. |
21 |
|
22 |
A team can have the best rhetoric in the world, but if they don't |
23 |
actually show up and field a team on game day, they lose by default. |
24 |
Fortunately or unfortunately, that looks to be where this is headed. |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
28 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
29 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |