1 |
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> writes: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> Would it be possible to add the tree categories as products and the |
6 |
>> packages as components thereof? |
7 |
> |
8 |
> It makes moving a bug from one package to another quite a complex task |
9 |
> though, as it requires two confirmation screens... and trust me that |
10 |
> happens often enough. |
11 |
> |
12 |
Shouldn't that just be scripted via pybugz? A GUI for that would be nice; |
13 |
perhaps as a pida[1] module. Frankly it appals me that y'all have so much |
14 |
time to write bash scriptlets and none to develop tools for your own use. |
15 |
|
16 |
> Plus that would work fine if we had a bugzilla for ebuilds only, but |
17 |
> would you really mix categories together with Infra, Portage, Gentoo |
18 |
> Hosted Projects, ... ? |
19 |
> |
20 |
Who cares? It's more organisation than you have now, and as I understand |
21 |
Duncan's suggestion it's first about adding a category above pkgs within |
22 |
Ebuilds <foo> (though I think he mixed up interface and tables a bit, sorry |
23 |
Duncan ;) Tree is the most fundamental work, besides portage. I guess a tag |
24 |
cloud would be nice tho. No reason you can't build associated metadata |
25 |
webapps on another host (cf beandog's portage postgres db[2].) |
26 |
|
27 |
[1] http://pida.co.uk/ |
28 |
[2] http://packages.larrythecow.org/ there's a FF plugin at: |
29 |
http://mycroft.mozdev.org/download.html?name=larrythecow |
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |