| 1 |
Alex Legler wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 19:09:38 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> |
| 3 |
> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> Seriously, it's out there, there's no reason to keep it from stable. |
| 6 |
>> Just prevent people from making python invoke 3.x and everything will |
| 7 |
>> be fine. |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Yeah, right, let's install it on all those stable machines, but then |
| 11 |
> not use it. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Way to go! |
| 14 |
> Alex |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Surely this isn't an issue: If the dependencies on packages are correct, |
| 17 |
surely this shouldn't happen? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
If the dependencies aren't correct, maybe checking and correcting them |
| 20 |
for every package that needs python should be a requirement for |
| 21 |
stabilization. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
AllenJB |
Archives