| 1 |
Jakub Moc wrote: |
| 2 |
> > Try reading the bug - users are basically being shoved off with an |
| 3 |
> > arrogant silence and a stamp on their forehead saying INVALID. |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > Nothing personal against Jakub Moc who probably has a lot to do, but |
| 6 |
> > the handling of relevant issues raised in the bugzilla is just |
| 7 |
> > unacceptable. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Dependency on a particular gcc version will solve exactly nothing. |
| 10 |
> Having that version installed doesn't mean you are really *using* it. |
| 11 |
> You won't be automagically switched to 3.4.x when upgrading from 3.3.x, |
| 12 |
> you won't be automatically switched to gcc 4.x when upgrading from 3.4.x |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Yes ok. So the user has to both merge the new version, and switch to it. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Either way, the end user is not getting told what should be done, |
| 17 |
instead Portage just breaks, which is exactly what all the complaints |
| 18 |
are about. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> How about the you finally upgrade your outdated gcc, as asked over and |
| 21 |
> over again? gcc-3.3.x is dead, unsupported upstream, we won't be fixing |
| 22 |
> any bugs there. Hard to understand? Apparently, I guess... |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
I've never been told so, I have no clue what you are talking about. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
> Thanks for your rant. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
What kind of reply do you expect to get from such crap? |
| 29 |
Thanks for being an asshole? |
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives