1 |
and blessed be my work |
2 |
|
3 |
Ned Ludd wrote: |
4 |
|
5 |
>On Sat, 2004-09-11 at 14:43, Daniel Goller wrote: |
6 |
> |
7 |
> |
8 |
>>GCC 3.4 should be ready to go ~x86 w/o being profile masked in x86 |
9 |
>>profiles anymore. |
10 |
>>There are no critical packages that dont compile with it. |
11 |
>>If anyone sees a reason to not unmask it, let me know, otherwise we |
12 |
>>would like to unamsk it soon. |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>> |
15 |
> |
16 |
>Ideally I'd like to see us get all arches that can use gcc-3.4 on it and |
17 |
>in stable for the next release cycle. So this ~x86 unmask in profiles |
18 |
>has my blessing. Works best when used in tandem with >=binutils-2.15 |
19 |
>(feature wise) |
20 |
> |
21 |
>Users that experience failures of gcc/binutils/libc compiling itself |
22 |
>should send any bugs toolchain@g.o |
23 |
>Usually this is only limited the users with buggy athlon{,-xp} hardware |
24 |
>that ever seem to have problems. |
25 |
> |
26 |
>Programs that fail to compile with 3.4.x that previously compiled with |
27 |
>3.3.4 should be routed to gcc-porting@g.o and package maintainers |
28 |
>respectively. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> |
31 |
> |
32 |
>>-- |
33 |
>>gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
34 |
>> |
35 |
>> |
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |