Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Daniel Goller <morfic@g.o>
To: solar@g.o
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 3.4 and ~x86
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 23:06:36
Message-Id: 414385A8.2040906@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 3.4 and ~x86 by Ned Ludd
1 and blessed be my work
2
3 Ned Ludd wrote:
4
5 >On Sat, 2004-09-11 at 14:43, Daniel Goller wrote:
6 >
7 >
8 >>GCC 3.4 should be ready to go ~x86 w/o being profile masked in x86
9 >>profiles anymore.
10 >>There are no critical packages that dont compile with it.
11 >>If anyone sees a reason to not unmask it, let me know, otherwise we
12 >>would like to unamsk it soon.
13 >>
14 >>
15 >
16 >Ideally I'd like to see us get all arches that can use gcc-3.4 on it and
17 >in stable for the next release cycle. So this ~x86 unmask in profiles
18 >has my blessing. Works best when used in tandem with >=binutils-2.15
19 >(feature wise)
20 >
21 >Users that experience failures of gcc/binutils/libc compiling itself
22 >should send any bugs toolchain@g.o
23 >Usually this is only limited the users with buggy athlon{,-xp} hardware
24 >that ever seem to have problems.
25 >
26 >Programs that fail to compile with 3.4.x that previously compiled with
27 >3.3.4 should be routed to gcc-porting@g.o and package maintainers
28 >respectively.
29 >
30 >
31 >
32 >>--
33 >>gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
34 >>
35 >>
36
37 --
38 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list