| 1 |
On 03/08/10 14:13, Róbert Čerňanský wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 11:06:40 +0100 |
| 3 |
> Sebastian Pipping <sping@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> There are a few patterns for potentially low hanging fruits among |
| 6 |
>> Gentoo bugs: |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> SRC_URI errors |
| 9 |
>> Missing depencies |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> (Sorry for answering a developer targeted question while I'm not one.) |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
happy to have your input. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> - Minor version bumps (After examination what upstream changed and |
| 17 |
> after confirmation with mantainer, if any.) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
needs good care and a little luck, but still, yes. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
> - Stable requests |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
only if you're an arch tester. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
> - New ebuilds |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
that's a tough one too, because it's often not a good idea to pull |
| 30 |
something into the tree, e.g. when you don't use it yourself on a |
| 31 |
regular basis. i have done that before, but i think twice by now. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
sebastian |
Archives