Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: gentoo-pms@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: gentoo sync based unified deps proposal
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:19:41
Message-Id: CA+czFiBKrVNqs_z4fh3wM0T-xcMNOJ1g9E5sGQ-aOqbX-DLPiA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: gentoo sync based unified deps proposal by Hans de Graaff
1 On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Hans de Graaff <graaff@g.o> wrote:
2 > On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 11:47 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
3 >
4 >> Yes, and sometimes we're doing 'use test'. I simply don't see how
5 >> adding a separate group of dependencies just for 'test' phase is going
6 >> to help us. They fit just fine into build-time dependencies right now.
7 >
8 > It would enable us to consider making tests on some packages optional to
9 > break circular dependencies with FEATURES=test, i.e. only run the tests
10 > if the test dependencies can be installed without circular dependencies.
11 >
12 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=175808
13
14 Thought: That might also allow you to split an emerge into two
15 separate jobs. I.e. "it's inconvenient, difficult or impossible to
16 have test dependencies installed at build time, but we could circle
17 back and run the tests in a test-only entry somewhere later in the job
18 queue, if the package build setup can support it."
19
20 --
21 :wq