| 1 |
How about simply closing sunrise to new packages, and migrate them to |
| 2 |
elsewhere as resources permit? |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Just plugging the spigot and deprecating it would improve things. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 12:55 AM, Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@g.o> |
| 7 |
wrote: |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 09:44:42AM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: |
| 10 |
> > On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 11:23 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 11 |
> > > Your thoughts? |
| 12 |
> > I would agree that proxy-maint and GH pull requests are better than |
| 13 |
> > sunrise, and so we should probably sunset (pun intended) the latter. |
| 14 |
> The new method is better, but that doesn't cover what to do with the |
| 15 |
> 500+ packages in sunrise. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> I have found them useful in the past, when I suddenly had a need for |
| 18 |
> something, and there was an ebuild in sunrise that I could adopt into |
| 19 |
> the tree. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> -- |
| 22 |
> Robin Hugh Johnson |
| 23 |
> Gentoo Linux: Dev, Infra Lead, Foundation Trustee & Treasurer |
| 24 |
> E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
| 25 |
> GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 |
| 26 |
> GnuPG FP : 7D0B3CEB E9B85B1F 825BCECF EE05E6F6 A48F6136 |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> |
Archives