Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] reconciling new-style virtuals with overlays, was: RDEPENDing on packages from overlays? | ||
| Date: | Sat, 23 Apr 2011 13:43:13 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20110423143709.4aa18f6a@googlemail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] reconciling new-style virtuals with overlays, was: RDEPENDing on packages from overlays? by "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn" |
||
| 1 | On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 15:28:04 +0200 |
| 2 | Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn <chithanh@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > Because there is a reason for not doing so, or because you think that |
| 4 | > multi-repository support is a superior solution which will come |
| 5 | > sooner? |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Because what you propose solves nothing, and prevents the entire point |
| 8 | of the exercise, which is to do away entirely with old style virtuals |
| 9 | and all the problems they introduce. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] reconciling new-style virtuals with overlays, was: RDEPENDing on packages from overlays? | "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn" <chithanh@g.o> |