| 1 |
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 03:27:53PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 15:09:24 +0200 Harald van Dijk <truedfx@g.o> |
| 3 |
> wrote: |
| 4 |
> | You're suggesting jakub maybe shouldn't even be a Gentoo dev because |
| 5 |
> | he *doesn't* give one unofficial overlay special treatment over |
| 6 |
> | another? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> One unofficial project that has screwed up so badly that the council |
| 9 |
> has had to step in and say no to it, |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
It's entirely possible that I missed some important message, but as far |
| 12 |
as I know, council hasn't said either yes or no to it, and the overlay |
| 13 |
as hosted on o.g.o is suspended only until a council decision is made. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> as opposed to an unofficial |
| 16 |
> project that has not attracted complaints and that is being worked into |
| 17 |
> the tree? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Quoting the original message: |
| 20 |
"Until the council makes a firm decision about non-gentoo hosted |
| 21 |
overlays, this will be the defining method of dealing with them." |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Please explain to me how any non-gentoo hosted overlay can possibly be |
| 24 |
an exception to this. |
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives