Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Martin Ehmsen <ehmsen@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] License advice
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 13:49:36
1 I'm not sure how to correctly handle bug #87542.
3 It is about a dev-tex package that doesn't have a license (ctan doesn't
4 state one, and no license can be found anywhere else).
5 By definition I have to assume that it is proprietary.
6 But an eager bug reporter has gotten a statement from the two authors,
7 that the package is meant to be public-domain.
9 Should I require a public statement from the authors, like an update
10 version on ctan that states the license, or is it enough to refer to the
11 bug report? (ie., is it enough that the reporter says that the author
12 said the package is public-domain?)
14 --
16 Martin Ehmsen
17 --
18 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] License advice "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <flameeyes@g.o>