1 |
I'm not sure how to correctly handle bug #87542. |
2 |
|
3 |
It is about a dev-tex package that doesn't have a license (ctan doesn't |
4 |
state one, and no license can be found anywhere else). |
5 |
By definition I have to assume that it is proprietary. |
6 |
But an eager bug reporter has gotten a statement from the two authors, |
7 |
that the package is meant to be public-domain. |
8 |
|
9 |
Should I require a public statement from the authors, like an update |
10 |
version on ctan that states the license, or is it enough to refer to the |
11 |
bug report? (ie., is it enough that the reporter says that the author |
12 |
said the package is public-domain?) |
13 |
|
14 |
-- |
15 |
|
16 |
Martin Ehmsen |
17 |
-- |
18 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |