| 1 |
Marius Mauch <genone@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> --Signature=_Sun__30_May_2004_19_07_48_+0200_6XzyE=HrDgWH2+9q |
| 3 |
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
| 4 |
> Content-Disposition: inline |
| 5 |
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> On 05/30/04 Eamon Caddigan wrote: |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
>> I do value the opinion of the folks here on -dev: I'd love to hear |
| 10 |
>> feedback on my idea, but I'd rather not rehash old arguments with |
| 11 |
>> which I mostly agree! I'm not advocating any changes to the default |
| 12 |
>> behavior of 'rm'. Indeed, the solution I proposed -- while not perfect |
| 13 |
>> -- does preserve full backward-compatability. Please read it, and let |
| 14 |
>> me know what you think. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Better propose it to the coreutils developers, this should either be |
| 17 |
> added upstream or left alone. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Oh definitely. However, before bothering the corutils folks, I'd |
| 20 |
probably write the patch for it first, and before I do /that/ I'd |
| 21 |
appreciate the input of experienced Linux users and admins... such as |
| 22 |
those found on Gentoo-dev. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-Eamon |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives