Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From:	Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To:	gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject:	Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes \| a solution for GLEP 55's problem
Date:	Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:34:23
Message-Id:	`20088.38450.587143.52345@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de`
In Reply to:	Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Making backwards-incompatible tree changes \| a solution for GLEP 55's problem by Ciaran McCreesh

1	>>>>> On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2
3	>> Paludis wise, it's eapi2 indirictely due to boost and eselect.
4
5	> The eselect dependency is hard, and can't easily be made optional,
6	> so ideally eselect should stick with older EAPIs.
7
8	Eselect's maintainer is well aware of this. I intend to keep 1.2.15
9	(which is EAPI 0) around for some time.
10
11	Ulrich