| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>Well yes, we already know we need a few dozen more new dependency |
| 4 |
>atoms. But we're dealing with "what we can use currently" here, not |
| 5 |
>some hypothetical future situation. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
Fair enough. One possible solution is to use some agreed-upon fooDEPEND |
| 9 |
within the current ebuilds and simply set for the time being: |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
DEPEND="${fooDEPEND} {DEPEND}" |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
at the end of the DEPEND list. This way we can solve the current |
| 14 |
compile problem, but for those who care a simple sed call will turn |
| 15 |
those headers into RDEPENDS. This could work the other way around as |
| 16 |
well of course. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Joshua Baergen |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives