Archives
Archives
| From: | Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? | ||
| Date: | Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:21:12 | ||
| Message-Id: | 52A8C91B.4010500@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? by Pacho Ramos |
||
| 1 | On 12/10/2013 08:55 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 2 | > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=197625#c14 |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > This has reminded me that maybe we should switch to cronie from |
| 5 | > vixie-cron as default and recommended cron provider in Handbook. Last |
| 6 | > time I checked, vixie-cron upstream was died while cronie forked it |
| 7 | > fixing some bugs :/ |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | > What do you think? |
| 10 | > |
| 11 | > |
| 12 | > |
| 13 | > |
| 14 | |
| 15 | If vixie-cron upstream is dead as you say, then I agree we should move |
| 16 | away from it. |
| 17 | |
| 18 | -- |
| 19 | Regards, |
| 20 | Markos Chandras |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook? | Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> |