Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From:	Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>
To:	Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
Cc:	Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>, base-system@g.o, toolchain@g.o
Subject:	Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/6] usr-ldscript.eclass: copy gen_usr_ldscript from toolchain-funcs.eclass
Date:	Mon, 15 Jul 2019 15:01:06
Message-Id:	`CAJ0EP432-kwn=-QMNQEJU_nMTPevabe7pPyWWsJ3Oc+8BxmA+g@mail.gmail.com`
In Reply to:	Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/6] usr-ldscript.eclass: copy gen_usr_ldscript from toolchain-funcs.eclass by Ulrich Mueller

1	On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 1:41 AM Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote:
2	>
3	> >>>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2019, Mike Gilbert wrote:
4	>
5	> > + [[ -z ${ED+set} ]] && local ED=${D%/}${EPREFIX}/
6	>
7	> Wouldn't this be a good time to drop such historical baggage, and
8	> instead only support EAPIs where ED is defined? (I see the occasional
9	> EAPI=4 in your list of ebuilds, but nothing older.)
10
11	Yes, I suppose that makes sense. I'll send a patch when I have time.