| 1 |
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:43:06PM -0800, Alec Warner wrote: |
| 2 |
> This is incorrect, or at least, was incorrect last time I looked |
| 3 |
> (circa...uhh..2009?) |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> They work 'ok' together. Heimdal clients could talk to MIT servers at |
| 6 |
> least. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
and vice-versa. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> Of course, there were quirks, and incompatible command line |
| 11 |
> syntax, hence my fierce recommendation to 'not do that.' |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Yes. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> > I don't think samba will support MIT, since it's kinda windows focused. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Ugh, no. MIT is not windows focused (although it does ship a windows |
| 18 |
client for better integration with *nix kdcs). Apple uses heimdal in |
| 19 |
recent macos'es and employs some main developers of heimdal and samba |
| 20 |
(hence samba - heimdal tight integration). There was some work from red |
| 21 |
hat to make samba4 work with mit-krb5 but it stalled and did not go |
| 22 |
anywhere (yet?) afaik. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Eray Aslan <eras@g.o> |
Archives