| 1 |
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:12:05 +0200 |
| 3 |
> Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: |
| 6 |
>> > The correct one should be xslt and that's it.. |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> Can you please motivate your opinion? Saying "that's it" is quite hostile. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Terse maybe. Blunt. Hostile? No. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Maybe not hostile, but it certainly is blunt, and it basically has an |
| 13 |
implied "because I said so." |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Nobody learns from a blunt answer. Potentially people learn from one |
| 16 |
that has a one-sentence rationale, even if it is just "for the reasons |
| 17 |
already stated." However, that is better accomplished by just ++'ing |
| 18 |
the previous post. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Rich |
Archives