| 1 |
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 08:53:39AM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 09:09:39PM +0100, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Am Donnerstag, 12. März 2020, 20:23:56 CET schrieb Michał Górny: |
| 4 |
> > > I suppose that a part of the problem is the default Reply-To in these |
| 5 |
> > > mails. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Yes, I agree that this is a problem. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> > Which was deliberately added... |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Why was this added? I have asked before and never gotten an answer. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
TL;DR specifically because gentoo-commits can only be emailed by the |
| 14 |
bots, and not everybody is on the other list anyway. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
infra/cfengine.git: |
| 17 |
commit 2d1156486f8f09ed4747a61d194928b05fdc974f |
| 18 |
Date: Fri Feb 4 01:51:31 2011 +0000 |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
It sets the Reply-To to be gentoo-dev@lists.g.o AND the change |
| 21 |
committer, on the basis that: |
| 22 |
- developers are NOT required to subscribe to gentoo-dev@ (that's why |
| 23 |
gentoo-dev-announce@ exists, which is mandatory). |
| 24 |
- Not every committer is a developer: the script is used for many repos, |
| 25 |
not just repo/gentoo.git |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
| 29 |
Gentoo Linux: Dev, Infra Lead, Foundation Treasurer |
| 30 |
E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
| 31 |
GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 |
| 32 |
GnuPG FP : 7D0B3CEB E9B85B1F 825BCECF EE05E6F6 A48F6136 |
Archives