Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Client-serve flags (again ;) (was Re: New eclass: gkrellm-plugin)
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 14:12:58
Message-Id: 1173449410.8538.4.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Client-serve flags (again ;) (was Re: New eclass: gkrellm-plugin) by Steve Long
1 On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 11:10 +0000, Steve Long wrote:
2 > I don't know how it would work technically, how difficult it would be, or
3 > indeed if anyone is prepared to do the work, besides maybe some of the
4 > users.
5
6 No.
7
8 Once we have USE-based dependencies across the board, then yes. Until
9 that time, we should really be building both client and server for *all*
10 packages. The *only* reason one should not be doing this is if they're
11 following the definition of minimal, or it is not possible to build both
12 the client and the server at the same time.
13
14 --
15 Chris Gianelloni
16 Release Engineering Strategic Lead
17 Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
18 Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
19 Gentoo Foundation

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies