| 1 |
On Mon, 2005-09-05 at 22:42 +0200, Simon Stelling wrote: |
| 2 |
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 3 |
> > | I'm asking that you assume any support burden that you create. It |
| 4 |
> > | only seems fair. |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > Stabling a package which is not in packahe.mask is only a support |
| 7 |
> > burden if package maintainers are abusing ~arch. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I absolutely agree with you, the only point is: |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> People are abusing ~arch in the real world, and we're not yet living in an ideal |
| 12 |
> world. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Yes it's true probably we should introduce another keyword for |
| 15 |
maintainers that is completly unstable. Then the Archs Teams keyword the |
| 16 |
packages. |
| 17 |
Most of the people don't understand that ~arch is a testing keyword and |
| 18 |
it's not stable. Fortunatly most of the bugs we get are from ~arch and |
| 19 |
not from stable arch. |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Luis Medinas <metalgod@g.o> |
| 22 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~metalgod |
| 23 |
Gentoo Linux Developer: AMD64,Printing,Media-Optical |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives