| 1 |
On Sat, 20 Jun 2020 16:05:38 +0200 |
| 2 |
Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Sat, 2020-06-20 at 14:57 +0100, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Give maintainers the chance to act and flag packages that pull in python:2.7. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > Signed-off-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@g.o> |
| 8 |
> > --- |
| 9 |
> > profiles/package.deprecated | 4 ++++ |
| 10 |
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > diff --git a/profiles/package.deprecated b/profiles/package.deprecated |
| 13 |
> > index a756e845f47..bb661571962 100644 |
| 14 |
> > --- a/profiles/package.deprecated |
| 15 |
> > +++ b/profiles/package.deprecated |
| 16 |
> > @@ -17,6 +17,10 @@ |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > #--- END OF EXAMPLES --- |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> > +# Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@g.o> (2020-06-20) |
| 21 |
> > +# Deprecated. Consider poring to python 3 and drop support for python2. |
| 22 |
> > +dev-lang/python:2.7 |
| 23 |
> > + |
| 24 |
> > # Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@g.o> (2020-02-22) |
| 25 |
> > # virtual/libstdc++ has only one sys-libs/libstdc++-v3 provider. |
| 26 |
> > # Use that instead. Or even better use none of them. It's a |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
> It will trigger the same for packages that support *only* |
| 30 |
> Python 2.7, as well as these that support 2.7 in addition to 3 because |
| 31 |
> they have 2.7 deps. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
If we expect actions by developers on both cases I don't see a problem with that. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Sergei |
Archives