| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 09/29/2012 05:37 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> There isn't so much a problem with the current python-distutils-ng |
| 7 |
> eclass but rather it's to expand it to a more comprehensive |
| 8 |
> replacement for both distutils and python eclasses. In order to |
| 9 |
> do that efficiently, most of the core functionality should be moved |
| 10 |
> so that the new distutils is more like a wrapper to the new |
| 11 |
> python. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> This could certainly be done by patching the existing eclass, but |
| 14 |
> mgorny wants to use new eclass names instead of keeping the |
| 15 |
> current one. Hence the rename. I think that's about it.. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
To be a bit more precise: |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
if we really want to replace python.eclass we should start the new |
| 21 |
eclass by gathering a list of features the python herd and developers |
| 22 |
want. I think there already is something like that, no? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
I don't see a point in adding a draft-eclass to the tree. |
| 25 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 26 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
| 27 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQZxguAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWz29QH/2mylpPs2759z27RKqvmdGh8 |
| 30 |
X8bV+CMRqWBPl1+blXpGlX9Bf6Er7MRQD1XarqpgvT+1ALhJYL0SZO/MA5DTxvkJ |
| 31 |
1EdhdlIVK2ew6UTOmH0jin+wSuspBE1ZpLJCLLWQ94PQgLScaVmAj+XWMLuCbSOF |
| 32 |
GfKW1thACamIKl3ej1foxMzD9mtSvufqI+eZQd0V341jHR1v5JF8LeqfC3C8c8nR |
| 33 |
AalRvqbh1QltzcX7ao8wWeq4cYUAGrYACrjQqiEtEnMuUkk2upQMzdjt0I41D5vT |
| 34 |
oOJtlsk742SLdE4ZIHCsXbjeEOKaFiLBlDjHvcvkWl4MkbKQ6pGpnsTYSpDm8+k= |
| 35 |
=iY6x |
| 36 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives